Last week, I was up on Orcas Island giving a talk on climate change in the Northwest. While on Orcas, there was one place I was really interested in seeing...and it wasn't Mt. Constitution. Rather, I wanted to check out an extraordinarily long-lasting observation site (122 years) that has been run by the Willis family the entire time: Olga 2E. You can imagine my delight when during the questions and answers, I found John Willis--the current keeper of the observing flame--right in front of me.
An observing site like Olga 2SE (meaning it is found roughly 2 miles southeast of the town of Olga) is meteorological gold. First, it is very long lasting, so we can really see the trends. Second, it is in a rural area, so urban development is not an issue. We owe John and his family a great deal for taking the time to provide this invaluable service to the region and the nation.
Just to orient you...here is a large map, followed by a closer in view, both using Google maps, that shows you the location of this site:
The green arrow is close to the location, but off by a few feet. To really see it, here are some photos from the ground. (I got these images from a really excellent site created by Anthony Watts and associates: surfacestation.org -check WA sites here). One close image and the other a bit back. The temperature sensor is in the white housing, just north of the stairs. A bit close to the porch, but that is probably consistent with the exposure over the last century.
What has this observing site told us about changes in the local climate for over a century? Let me show you a few plots I made using the nice facility available at the Office of the Washington State Climatologist (found here). First, annual precipitation (blue line). The state average is shown in green and the trend in red. On average about 28.68 inches a year (roughly ten inches less than Seattle). Really very little long-term trend: a small downward tendency of .13 inches per decade. Less precipitation extremes lately. The State average is more...and not much trend in that either.
How about annual average maximum temperature at Olga? Max temperatures appear to be cooling weakly...by about .05 F per decade. This is consistent with other rural sites around the region--there is really very little sign of maximum temperature warming.
But annual average minimum temperature is a different story. Virtually no trend until 1975 and then a jump in temperature. As first I was suspicious of this jump, but checked out other local stations and many of them had a similar feature.
For example, consider Blaine or Port Angeles (you can click on them to enlarge). Both show the warming after 1975.
OK, I believe that there was a warming in the minima at Olga 2E....but why? One possible contributor to this might be the profound change in the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) at that time. We believe the PDO is a form a natural variability for the Pacific basin, shifting from warm to cool phases over a period of roughly 30 years. Around 1975 the PDO transitioned quickly from a cool to warm phase. So that is origin of the warming and probably the best one. Or perhaps it is some influence of increased greenhouse gases--more moisture or greenhouse gases in the air keeping up minimum temperatures. At Olga it is certainly not local urbanization.
With cooling maxima and rising minima, the total (or mean) temperature change is a slight trend upward. Roughly 1F since 1955 (after which greenhouse gases increased more rapidly), less or even warming if you pick other periods. Bottom line: no significant changes in temperature over the period of record.
Here are the extreme daily temperatures during the year at Olga. Notice the interesting cold excursions (green lines) during the winter..some even going below zero! These are associated with strong northeasterly flow bringing arctic air through the Fraser River Valley. Never go above the low 90s there for the extreme max.
Observing sites like Olga 2E give us important insights into long-term climatic trends unavailable from shorter lived stations. They also identify earlier warm periods (like the 1930s), that are not included in the records of most climatological stations, many of which started in the 1940s and 1950s.
Orcas Island has a fascinating meteorology that includes blasts of northeast winds from Fraser River Valley, strong southeasterlies during the winter, a large contrast of precipitation due to it proximity to the Olympic rain shadow, and much more....perhaps in a future blog I will talk about it.
The Trans Alaska Pipeline began pumping oil in 1977. I can't remember where the majority of the oil tankers go when they leave Valdez, but I'd bet that at least some of them go to Anacortes.
ReplyDeleteI believe that the refinery was originally opened in 1958, so I'm probably blowing a lot of smoke regarding localized climate impact of these two elements.
That's right across Rosario Strait from me.
ReplyDeleteOff the subject but check out this recent picture of an impressive rain storm in Tokyo. They call it a Guerilla Rainstorm.
ReplyDeletehttp://en.rocketnews24.com/2012/09/02/guerrilla-rainstorm-caught-on-camera-from-tokyo-skytree/
Fun, but it reminds me that in earthquake monitoring, we almost never interpret records from just on seismometer, especially if the trends are interesting. It seems as though details such as chopping down a tree, plants in the planter, a different color of paint on the wall, could move the thermometer a degree or two, comparable to the apparent trends.
ReplyDeleteAs a neophyte, I'm just guessing that these plots are yearly averages of max and min recorded daily, and that is all that is available, or else you'd use a more robust measure such as average daily temperature?
Cliff, check your data. According to these the maximum temp there in 105 years was only 62.5F and the coldest temp was 38F. Certainly its been hotter or colder than that up there. What about the heat wave 3-4 summers back when Chehalis was 110. It must have been warmer than 62.5F up on Orcas then.
ReplyDeleteKenna...this is annual average temperature...so not the absolute max...so its ok..cliff
ReplyDeleteHi Cliff
ReplyDeleteThe folk very concerned with global warming are always jumping on weather events, plant and animal trends, ice pack surveys, etc. as the early signs of a warming planet. Some of these trends and events you have disputed as correct evidence of global warming. I know that you do think that the planet is warming, but I am curious as which empirical evidence do you think will show this effect clearly and when will do you think it will clear to unbiased but skeptical observer?
In other words could you write a post on which changes will put this debate to rest for folks with an open mind and how long do we have to wait to see these changes measured?
It is really great that the family has established a tradition, as it were, of weather monitoring. Here's hoping it continues for generations to come!
ReplyDeleteI briefly glimpsed a "climate tribes" post.
ReplyDeleteI'd preemptively suggest it would not be useful nor accurate to characterize the two sides in the climate change debates as symmetric in their tactics, depth of knowledge, nor verisimilitude, despite some superficial parallels.
Great to hear about a generational effort to provide data.
ReplyDeleteThere is remarkabl climate variability on Orcas and it is expressed in the island ecosystems. A portion of the west side of the island has a forest of Garry oak and Rocky Mountain juniper - unique to Washington State and a result of the dryness on that portion of the island.
From Olga, SW of Willis': Quick note of thanks for your informative, objective presentation last week at the Orcas Center. Anticipating SRO crowd, we arrived an hour ahead of time. Not surprising that you packed the house. Gratified to see the pre-presentation political lines-in-the-sand among us neighbors blown away by your factual, objective talk. . . An almost literal breath of fresh air, amidst so many other branches of Academia (Education, Journalism, Humanities, etc?) where credibility is trending downward! We appreciate all you do, sir.
ReplyDelete