Let's analyze the possibilities, making use of the most powerful probabilistic forecasting tools at our disposal. We will attempt to avoid the problems experienced during the October 15th storm by highlighting the forecast uncertainties and the use of ensembles.
Snow Forecasting is HARD
Let me begin by noting a key point: it is difficult to get lowland snow around Puget Sound because the Pacific Ocean and Puget Sound are relatively warm (around 50F). It is easy for us to be mild and wet and frequently we are cool and dry. But to be cool and wet is very hard, demanding a rare configuration of pressure and winds. As a result, snow is the most difficult forecast problem in our area.
As I have mentioned frequently, all forecasts should be probabilistic and the most potent tool to create probabilities and to determine uncertainty is through the use of ensemble forecasts--running weather models many times with different initial states and model physics (e.g., moist processes).
So let's look at some ensembles! We can start with the NOAA/NWS GEFs ensemble of 21 members (relatively coarse 35 km grid spacing) for snow over the next week (see below). Dates/times are in UTC/Z, the average of all the ensemble members (the ensemble mean) is shown in dark black, the individual ensemble members are in light gray, and the blue line is single high-resolution (13 km) GFS forecast.
Note that the ensemble mean shows about 1.5 inches by 4 AM Monday (12Z, 5 December) and there is considerable spread (from 6 inches to 0). Most members produce 1-4 inches. The high-resolution run is very different, with no snow until later in the week.
The top panel shows the accumulated snowfall for each ensemble member for Seattle. Note that most members show snow starting on Sunday or Monday (Dec 4th or 5th) and several members show much more snow later in the week (8th or 9th).
What about temperature in Seattle? Here are the ensemble forecasts for high and low temperatures from the EC model. The single high resolution forecast is black, the ensemble mean is green, and the range of the forecasts are shown by the blue "whiskers". The rectangles encompass the 50% of forecasts closest to the mean.
The big story....a major cool down, with daily highs dropping from 46-47F to around 40 F on Monday. Even lower after that. After around 200 h, the uncertainty becomes very, very large.
So based on the ensembles, I feel pretty confident to forecast much cooler temperatures next week. And the ensembles suggest a good chance of getting at least a dusting early next week, with more later.
Finally, with all that I have said about uncertainty, lets look the latest UW high-resolution run, which is driven by the high-resolution NOAA/NWS GFS model.
On Sunday at 1 AM, a very strong Pacific cold front is pushing southward over NW Oregon, with cold temperatures behind.
By 4 AM Monday, cold air (blue/purple/white colors) had spread over our region.
By 1 PM Monday, a low-center had formed just off of the SW WA coast-- this is getting close to a typical snow pattern for Puget Sound.
The 24h total now forecasts ending 4 AM Sunday indicates LOTS of snow over the WA Cascades (skier will rejoice)
The subsequent 24 h brings lowland snow, mainly over SW WA and western Oregon. But the uncertainty is very large, so be prepared for the details to change.Bottom line of the above: there is a high probability that we will see substantially colder temperatures over the region starting Sunday. It is probable but not certain that there will be some light snow at lower elevation on Monday (with the potential for more in some locations). There is a good chance of heavier snow (a few inches) later in the week. At this point, the ensemble don't indicate a major regional low level snow. The mountains will get large amounts of snow, including the lower passes.
Thank you. I really like how you are showing the various possibilities and uncertainties that influence your forecast!
ReplyDeleteThanks Cliff - This potential for snowfall here has me thinking about what has happened in Siberia recently with very cold air being displaced from the Arctic down into Russia (and with the Arctic ocean and air temperature tens of degrees warmer than usual). My question for you: is there any possibility that a similar displacement of cold air from the Arctic could occur this year, only this time into the northeast Pacific and NW U.S.? With the Arctic Ocean so warm and the jet stream wobbling, could we see some extremely cold weather in Washington state before the earth decides the sub zero weather really belongs at the North Pole with Santa?
ReplyDeleteThanks, very nice job describing the probabilities and level of certainty.
ReplyDeleteLET IT SNOW, LET IT SNOW, LET IT SNOW.
ReplyDeleteYay!
ReplyDeleteFingers crossed! :-)
ReplyDeletePlease happen!
ReplyDeleteI live for lowland snow and after living here since 1976, can tell you it usually does not pan out. Surprises happen even at the last minute around here, which warm things up. Seems very unlikely to pan out.
ReplyDeleteRight? I so wish long range forecasts were guaranteed to happen. Looking at the 11th - 13th it shows massive cold and wet systems coming down from Alaska. Looks like an arctic express. But....we all know that far out is not even close to reliable. Sigh.....
DeleteRichard and Windlover, I am right there with you! However, after about 40 years of NW weather watching I have learned wisely that model surfing can be a futile winter hobby around here! So often what the 7-10 day models give, the models taketh away... However, after reading your analysis Cliff, I am confident someone between Bham and PDX will get some snow! At this point, I will hold my excitement until I see the Saturday evening OOZ runs come out. After a lame couple years, we are overdue some winter fun! ;)
ReplyDeleteWeatherfreak, well said! Unfortunately that doesn't seem to stop me from looking at the 7-10 day models, living in hope, and then being a little disappointed..... I also live for lowland snow and the last couple years HAVE been lame.
ReplyDeleteCliff, any chance you could share why the PNEF WRF-GFS (and MM5-NAM) runs process twice a day instead of four? I'm guessing there's a perfectly logical reason, just curious what it is!
Better be some down in Oregon too
ReplyDeleteSo . . . do all the people yammering for snow in the lowlands drive, or even own an automobile? Snow in Seattle just drives up insurance rates. Bah and double humbug!
ReplyDeleteI'm hoping for a convergence zone thundersnow--the GFS shows that it could be -38c at 500mb on Monday and there should be enough moisture for showers. I forget what year it was, but a thunderstorm went over our neighborhood one time and in just a half hour we got a few inches of snow, lots of fun! I'm going to put out a big tarp and catch what I can Sunday/Monday, then pull the tarp back Monday night and Tuesday when the colder Canadian air filters in to let the ground freeze up in time for the overrunning snow Wednesday. Maybe some of those plans will work out, ha!
ReplyDeleteAgreed strix27. One of the main reasons why I reside in the Puget Sound area is the overall lack of snow/sub-freezing temps. The other people commenting here should live in Buffalo or Minneapolis if they love the snow so much.
ReplyDeleteIt's fine to be able to drive up to the mountains and get the occasional snow now and then, but let stay up there where it belongs.
By that logic, you should move to Southern California or Florida, Malcolm.
ReplyDeleteSo will the moisture traveling from hawaii in the next few weeks combine with the jetstream path about to hit washington to form an atmospheric river? Or pineapple express for southern california? The conditions, sst and split jetstream path in the western pacific looks a hell of a lot like 2010.
ReplyDelete