Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Eastside Thunderstorms and Lightning

Yesterday, residents of eastern Oregon and Washington was provided with a great show of lightning, thunder, heavy rain and strong winds. The cause?   A line of strong thundershowers that moved northward out of California and Nevada during the early afternoon, strengthening during the later afternoon and evening.  Here is a visible satellite picture around 5 PM...you can see the east-west line of thunderstorms;  each individual storm is associated with white oval shapes, which are the anvils of the convection.


The Pendleton, Oregon radar got a nice view of the passing storms....here are a few examples an hour apart.  The red and blue areas are either very heavy rain or hail. (click on images to enlarge)




These thunderstorm were associated with a log of lightning...here are some samples from the national lightning detection network at 7 PM and 9:30 PM.






Lets take a look at the rainfall totals for the storm, which ranged as high as 1.29 inches at Heppner, Oregon (see graphic).  Do you know what happened at Heppner?  It was the site of the most deadly convective flash flood in U.S. history in which 247 individuals lost their lives.


Here is a picture of the aftermath of the storm on June 14, 1903.   There is a

Heppner, Oregon in 1903
comprehensive book on the subject published by UW Press called Calamity (info here).
Heppner is on the slopes of the Blue Mountains and located on a normally minor creek...thunderstorms in the Blues turned it into a torrent.

Strong winds accompanied these powerful storms--take a look at the observations at Walla Walla.  Winds gusted to 47 knots (54 mph), with higher gusts at nearby Hermiston (60 mph).  Before the storm the temperature was near 80F with a dew point of 62F.  Folks,that is a really high dew point for these parts....more like the eastern U.S.


How good were the forecasts?   Well, I wish I could cite this as another success for the WRF and other models, but it wasn't.  The morning WRF model run (initialized at 5 AM Monday) showed very little, just a few light showers moving through (see graphic of the 24h hour precipitation ending 5 AM this morning)

24-h precipitation from UW WRF ending 5 AM
This failure was also evident in the NWS model (NAM) and the UW ensembles.  The interesting thing is that the models and soundings showed great instability (high CAPE--convective available potential energy);they just didn't have any forcing (front, upper level short wave) to trigger them off.   The NWS folks in Spokane discussed this situation during the afternoon and were not sure what to predict, so they just noted the potential for thunderstorms, with a lot of uncertainty.  Here is what they said:

"Tonight and Tuesday...Upper level ridge axis remains fixed over 
  the PacNW...with deep southerly flow continuing to pump moisture 
  and instability northward. Model soundings and LAPS analysis show 
  CAPE values exceeding 1000 j/kg over most of our forecast area 
  east of a line from Republic to the Tri-Cities. These values are 
  very impressive for April...let alone any time of year...but that`s 
  what happens when surface temps rise into the 80s...with dewpoints 
  in the mid 40s to mid 50s. Despite the potential 
  instability...tapping into it is no sure bet...especially given 
  the lack of a trigger or focusing mechanism. Looking at the latest 
  satellite imagery...there really is nothing downstream of us which 
  will trigger convection in the immediate future. Looks like better 
  chances will arrive as the convection over southern OR/ID move 
  northward overnight. There is a small chance some of this will 
  reach the WA/OR border toward sunset...and spread gradually 
  northward through the overnight hours." 

This was a very reasonable analysis.  The NWS staff in Pendleton were even more emphatic about the potential  for thunderstorm...and they were correct.    Shows you the importance of having human forecasters for such difficult events.

Clearly, there was some forcing feature\s that the models missed...it will be interesting to explore this case further.  The runs initialized at 5 PM were much better, but they weren't available until after the action got started.






6 comments:

JServais said...

Interesting? Right. Like very blown forecasts. Not even close from 12 hours away. We have gusting 30 + winds in Bellingham with rain and cold that was not predicted yesterday. ?? No trigger seen? 12 hours? More than just interesting.

Jim said...

Castlegar (in the West Kootenay) had >2cm hail late in the afternoon. Since verification began in 2000, it was the first severe thunderstorm report in BC during the month of April.

By the way, we cancelled out on our four free rounds of golf at North Bellingham because of what was happening in Chilliwack and what the radar was showing. Did not trust the 30% chance of showers in the forecast.

Jim said...

Castlegar (in southeast BC) had >2cm hail late yesterday. Since verification began in 2000, it was the first report of a severe thunderstorm in BC during the month of April.

By the way, we cancelled our golf trip to Bellingham yesterday because of what the radar was showing. We didn't want to drive from Chilliwack and get rained out.

smokejumper said...

Speaking of the subject, I just did a little storm chasing this afternoon.

There was an awesome squall that rolled thru Yakima around 4pm. It had a signature wall cloud. I dunno know what its called. Ive only seen pictures. Layered cloud band out in front.

Brought traffic on highway 12 to a halt. Never seen that. So two things Ive never seen before.

Buddy said...

The Heppner flood is an incredible story. 3rd deadliest flash flood in US history behind the well known Jamestown and Black Hills.

Heppner didnt recover its population til 1990. They estimate the creek raged at 36000 cfs. Its normal flow is 50 cfs.

Thanks for sharing the story.

Chris Withers said...

So when is the most likely time for thunderstorms in the Whatcom County area. It seems like forever since we've had a good one. As a kid, it seems like we would get them all the time