Monday, July 13, 2020

Is Air Conditioning Contributing to Coronavirus Spread?

The headlines are screaming about recent increases in coronavirus cases, with some suggesting that the essential problem is the loosening of the lockdowns and restrictions.  A number of media sources note that many of the problematic locations are "red" states with Republican leadership. 

It is not surprising that moving out of lockdown resulted in more COVID-19 cases.  In addition, the increasing number of tests undoubtedly increases the number of known infected.

But could there be something else going on?

Could increased use of air conditioning, particularly in the southern tier of states, be a significant driver of increasing number of COVID-19 cases?

This blog will attempt to help answer this question.

So where is the virus really spreading?   A good way to see the problem locations is to view the percentage of positive tests.  A worsening epidemic is signaled by a higher percentage of positives, assuming there is widespread testing.  Positive percentage is far better than number of positive tests, which, of course, varies by the amount of testing.

Here is a plot of the positive percentage on July 7th.  The big problem states were Arizona, followed Mississippi, Florida, South Carolina, Texas, Georgia, Alabama, Nevada, and finally Idaho.

Below is a different type of plot that shows the same thing, but provides the actual numerical values.  The bottom line:  the situation is far worse for states along the southern tier of the U.S.  Arizona is the worst, with Mississippi and Florida right behind.  These are states with very different demographics.

But what do these states have in common?  Some media outlets are pushing the fact that most of these states are dominated by the Republican party and have been quicker to open up.  But they have something else in common:  these states have had high temperatures with a lot of air conditioning use.  (And no, there is no reason to think that heat turns people into Republicans).

If we look at the high temperatures in June (shown below, NOAA division dataset), southern Arizona (including Tucson) is the nation's hot spot--and yes, it is the hot spot for COVID-19 as well.    Mississippi, South Caroline, Florida, Texas are all very hot.  And according to U.S. Census data nearly all homes and most restaurants in these states have AC.

And an independent graphic, showing the high temperatures averaged over the 30 days ending July 7th (Climate Prediction Center), has a similar pattern.  Arizona has the highest temperatures.

So let us consider a hypothesis: the rapid warming in late spring led to greatly increased use of air conditioning in homes, stores and restaurants in the warm, southern tier states.   More people are thrust into interior spaces with recycled, recirculating air that increases COVID-19 spread, something described in several research papers.  And the cooler, drier conditions associated with air conditioned spaces are favorable for COVID-19, and the blowing air spreading COVID-19 containing droplets and aerosols.

Now is this hypothesis consistent with observations?     We can begin by looking at the total tests and percent of positive tests in Arizona (see below).   Tests went up substantially in May and June, but so did the percentage of positive tests, which has progressively risen since mid-May (the largest increase was in mid-June)

So what happened in Tucson, located in southern Arizona during June?    Temperatures exceeded 100F on many days and over half of the month was above normal (green shows the normal range).   Some days were way above normal.  June is the worst month in southern Arizona--very, very hot without the relief of the southwest monsoon in July.  Air conditioning was a necessity and this miserable period is exactly when the virus surged.

Florida had a similar story.  Positive percentages surged in middle and late June.

And this is exactly when temperatures surged to way  above normal in southern Florida (see below). And Florida has terrible humidity as well.  Folks were forced to flock to air conditioned spaces.

You want something more rigorous?  No problem.

If I was writing a paper on this topic, I would present a scatter diagram plotting the temperatures against positive percentages of COVID-10.  And I have done exactly that below.  Specifically, I found the June average maximum temperature for every state in the continental U.S. and its corresponding positive percentage for COVID-19 (Y-axis percentage, X-axis is average high temperature).  Each state is shown by a blue dot.  I only plotted states with max temperatures in June of 75F or more, which excluded a handful of states that are very cool and have very few air conditioners (e.g., WA, OR, and Montana).

I also plotted a best-fit line (red).   There DOES appear to be a relationship between COVID-19 infection rates and temperature.  The correlation coefficient is .69, which suggests this relationship explains about 48% of the variability.   That is quite a bit.  The point in the upper right corner?--Arizona.

Now certainly there are a number of factors that help explain the variability of COVID-19 infection rates around the U.S.     But I do think the above results are very, very suggestive that very warm temperatures result in increasing infection rate.  Not because the virus likes warm temperatures (it does not, as shown by a number of studies), but because warm temperatures push people indoors into air conditioned spaces in which spread is greatly enhanced.  Restaurants and bars are probably key here.

In warmer climates, summer is the time when folks huddle together in confined spaces and thus the greatest potential for COVID spread.  The implication of all this is that the situation might be expected to worsen over the southern tier states and into the warm/humid areas of the southeast over the next month or so, but improve during the fall.  Clearly, there is reason to avoid air conditioned interior spaces during a COVID epidemic, and dining should mainly limited to outdoor spaces, which should be quite safe.

Saturday, July 11, 2020

Watching Comet Neowise at 3:30 AM

I got up at 3 AM this morning to view COMET Neowise.   The COMET had passed the sun on July 3, getting as close as 27 million miles, and is now moving back out into the solar system.  Its orbital period, the time to complete a loop from near the sun to location far beyond the planets, is 6800 years.  So you better catch it this time.

It was not a little strange walking the streets to find a vantage point at 3:15 AM.   Some animals shuffled in the bushes and amazingly, there was some light on the northern horizon.   There is only about 2.5 hours of real night this time of the year and astronomical twilight had already begun when I was out there.   Extraordinarily, some folks were shooting off fireworks at the time and I could hear loud shouting in the distance. Perhaps their deep joy in seeing the comet.

When I climbed to a good perch to view the northeast horizon, I was able to see Neowise----faint, but clearly visible.  Here is a shot from my smartphone.

But if one wants a good picture of something in the sky, it often wise to first check with Greg Johnson of Skunk Bay Weather, who has a high quality camera surveilling the sky each night.  He captured the event nicely--check out his video (below).   You will see the comet rising, starting about 10 seconds in.  And at one point, the comet crosses a contrail from a high-flying jet.

A worry this morning was the high cirrus from an approaching weather will rain tonight.  Fortunately, the cirrus was thin enough, and the COMET bright enough, that one could see Neowise.

For those who don't like getting up at 3 AM, soon the COMET will be viewable after sunset.  And the COMET will be getting closer to us, being nearest on July 23rd (64 million miles!).   Unfortunately, moving away from the sun, the COMET will probably dim.   Hopefully, it will still be visible. 6800 years is a long time to wait.


If any reader is a Google employee and works on GoogleEarth, please contact me.  I need help in getting permission to use some images in the second edition of my Northwest Weather Book.