April 05, 2026

Major Global Cooling of the Past Two Years and the Big U.S. Heatwave Last Month. Climate Change?

One of the most effective and accurate ways to monitor the slow warming of our planet from increasing greenhouse gases is to use satellites that measure the radiation emitted by our atmosphere.  

One of the leading groups in using this technology is at the University of Alabama, Huntsville, led by Drs. Roy Spencer and John Christy.  

Below is their plot of lower atmosphere temperatures based on satellite data since 1979.

You will notice a slow rise in temperature over the past 50 years, by about 1°C.  This is probably mainly due to increasing CO2 and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.

You will also notice a lot of ups and downs on shorter time scales, which are mainly due to natural variability.  Of particular note is the big spike in warming in 2023, followed by rapid COOLING during the past few years.

The media and climate activists made a lot of false claims that the sudden warming in 2023 was due to human-emitted greenhouse gases, but have been very silent about the recent cooling.

Clearly, the cooling is not consistent with their "messaging" about global warming.


The truth was that the huge 2022 Hunga Tonga volcanic eruption ejected massive amounts of water vapor (a VERY potent greenhouse gas) into the stratosphere, which led to the spike in warming.  


The rapid warming had nothing to do with human emissions, with the global temperatures naturally declining as the excessive water vapor was slowly removed from the system.

Recently, the media and advocacy groups have been going bonkers about the recent March heatwave over the U.S., claiming with great certainty that it is the result of human-caused global warming.


These claims are easily disproved:  the heat wave was highly localized and some nearby areas were much colder than normal.

I can demonstrate this by showing you the temperature differences from normal (climatology) over the entire planet for March using the satellite observations noted above.  Red, orange, and yellow indicate warmer than normal temperatures, and blue indicates colder-than-normal temperatures (see below).

You can see the large area of warmer than normal temperatures centered over the western U.S.  No doubt about it.  But temperatures even MORE extreme on the COLD side to the north, from Alaska through northern Canada. 

Global warming advocates are often talking about the Arctic warming due to climate change, with sad stories about dying polar bears.   But in this case, a broad swath fo the Arctic was much colder than normal.

In the tropics temperatures were near normal. 

It is easy to determine the real cause of the temperature anomalies:  a highly perturbed upper-level flow pattern (see 500 hPa pressure level, about 18,000 ft, below).     Red indicates ridging or enhanced high pressure aloft, blue indicates troughing (ehanced low pressure).

The flow pattern was highly perturbed over North America.  Research is very clear that global warming does not contribute to such a pattern. 

 
Let me end with the Golden Rule of Climate Change.

The more extreme the anomaly from climatology (the average climate), the LESS likely it is that human-forced global warming is the cause.  This was true of the warming in 2023 and is true for last month's warm event over the western U.S.

Human-caused global warming is real, but it is slow and modest in magnitude, and global in scope.

19 comments:

  1. Great Blog Cliff, this reminds me of the big heat wave we had in June a few years back, while we were really hot at the same time it was almost 40 degrees below average in Central Canada.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I would suggest reading recent studies on the Hunga Tonga eruption, they point to slight net cooling not significant warming.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Micheal... I have read them all....over a dozen. In fact, the literature is divided....as many suggest warming as cooling. As you may know, I have written several papers on the impact of volcanic eruptions on climate and had an NSF grant on the topic. I have looked at the data and thinking about writing a paper on this event...cliff

      Delete
  3. I don’t disagree with the observations and facts about the weather, but one unusually cold month in the north isn’t going to do anything to change the overall trend of faster warming around the poles, resulting in melting permafrost, eroding coastlines, and disappearing sea ice. The polar bears’ decline continues all the same.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Good column, as always, Cliff, thanks for the perspective. And, regarding the supposed demise of polar bears - the BBC reports that polar bear populations, far from declining, are surging. Seems the hunting for seals, walrus, and reindeer, has gotten much easier for the bears. But don't take my word for it. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cx2l1xpz03no
    The article ends with a scientist's dire prediction that, eventually, the polar bears will die out. This, even though the article shows clearly that the bears have the ability to alter their behaviour, and find alternate sources of food. But, of course, that would go against the doomsday predictions so many would rather indulge in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Polar Bears may potentially die out if they aren't able to adapt to the changing environment they will be living in. That is true. However, it sounds like that scenario is actually becoming less likely to come to fruition since the bears are proving that they are quite adaptable. It will be very interesting to see what happens in the years ahead with regards to this.

      Delete
  5. Was there a cataclysmic event that took place in the 1996-1997 timeframe that could be correlated to the rapid warming that peaked in 1998?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Maybe this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1997%E2%80%9398_El_Ni%C3%B1o_event

      Delete
  6. Honest question: Do you believe reducing greenhouse gas emissions is a worthwhile goal, or do you think that it's not worth the sacrifice? I feel like the common thread in all your posts is that climate change will be mild and nothing at all to worry about. It makes me wonder why we're bothering to cut emissions. Is it just a massive boondoggle?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Just a sidenote of the polar bear population over time. They do just fine during warm periods

    https://share.google/JPLwvfXFP7LZNvHh3

    ReplyDelete
  8. Fascinating! Without leaping to conclusions at all, I've often wondered about the tangible 'climate' effects of Hawaiian volcanic eruptions on the temperature of the Pacific ocean. Rivers of magma flowing into the water (and gasses shooting into the atmosphere) have got to contribute more than a little to "pineapple express" events - but little's ever figured-in that I can find. Is any agency studying that - USGS, perhaps? I Google'd, and the USGS site says "Between 1912 and 2012, there were nearly 50 Kīlauea eruptions, 12 Mauna Loa eruptions, and one Hualālai intrusion of magma." I can't begin to guesstimate the amount of heat, but it has GOT to matter, to make a difference. A geologist I'm acquainted with has always been curious about the volcanism under the Antarctic, too. 'Heck if I can find much "data" anywhere; what a shame.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Yes, the air temperature has increased somewhat slowly and modestly- from a human standpoint. That’s because the oceans have been doing the heavy lifting, absorbing a large percentage of that extra heat. This does not bode well for ocean life as warmer water holds less oxygen and the carbonic acid created by increased CO2 in the air alters the pH of the ocean.
    Furthermore, nature can handle (natural selection and evolution) environmental change, but even the current “slow” temperature increases may be too rapid for a successful evolutionary response.
    I’m not totally up on latest research, so I hope I’m wrong!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Was there an event (that I don't remember) in 1996-1997 that contributed to the global temperature spike that peaked in 1998?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Well this winter in Alaska was a brutal one. It's finally moderating.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Seems notable that even with the last two years of cooling, we're still hotter than any pre-2023 year.

    ReplyDelete
  13. It's true that the most potent greenhouse gas is water vapor. Everything else pales by comparison. My guess is that large volcanoes that occur in the ocean cause some warming by releasing large quantities of water vapor, while those occurring on land cause cooling because they release only sulfur and ash. Cliff Mass, what do you think? Only a guess.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Joe Bastardi has looked a lot at geothermal's roll in climate -
    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.youtube.com/watch%3Fv%3D2aTf8vVocrY&ved=2ahUKEwiE0fDYztqTAxXMEjQIHYvbGQsQFnoECBwQAQ&usg=AOvVaw2cvNXDnJyUWwPKlM8ReFQK

    ReplyDelete
  15. Washington Post says there is a potential Super El Nino on the way. Cliff, what do you think and how will it affect PNW?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Spot on regarding the Hunga Tonga effect, Professor. It’s remarkable how quickly the mainstream narrative 'silences' atmospheric data when it doesn't fit the immediate alarmist headline.

    We see this confusion every day at https://www.wfy24.com travelers and logistics planners are so overwhelmed by conflicting messaging that they’ve stopped trusting even their local sensors. We actually had to build our own predictive layers and data dashboards specifically to filter out that noise and provide a 'ground truth' for real-world planning.

    If any of your readers want to see how these satellite-observed anomalies actually translate into live logistics conditions right now, feel free to check out our dashboard. Transparency in data is the only cure for the current climate communication gap.

    ReplyDelete

Please make sure your comments are civil. Name calling and personal attacks are not appropriate.

Fog In the Wrong Season

This morning, fog was widespread over the lowlands of western Washington, with many of the river valleys in the murk (see visible image belo...