November 22, 2025

The Problem With Wind Energy in the Northwest

This was a bad week for wind energy in the Northwest, but before I discuss this, let's step back for a few minutes.

There is a lot of interest in renewable energy in the Pacific Northwest that could supplement our hydropower.   

With our northern latitude and extensive clouds for much of the year, solar energy can only make a small contribution.   

To illustrate, here is the annual solar energy map for the U.S.  Western Oregon and Washington have poor solar resources.  Better in eastern Oregon and the Columbia Basin.  But even in these areas, there is very little resource from November through February.

The wind energy situation in the Northwest is better, but not particularly good.   Consider the map of annual wind energy resources in the U.S. (below).   The windy High Plains of the U.S. have terrific potential, but the western U.S., away from the coast, has very modest wind energy, at best.  Only the coastal waters from central Oregon to central CA have good wind potential.

Here in Washington State, the only decent non-coastal area for wind energy is the eastern slopes of the Cascades (see map below).   That is why nearly all of the wind turbines are there.  Constructing wind turbines offshore is very expensive and has significant environmental problems.

But there is a problem.   For much of the year, these turbines generate little power.

Consider the Bonneville Power Authority (BPA) statistics for the past week.   The total energy demand is the red line, and hydro generation is blue.

Wind energy (green) has been very small most of the week, except on one day (November 18) when a frontal system moved through.  The output from one nuclear plant (purple) has been constant and generally much higher.


The truth is that wind generation in our region is only really significant from late spring to late summer, when strong westerly flow descends the eastern slopes of the Cascades.

To see this, consider the winds at Ellensburg, surrounded by wind turbines on several sides.  Good winds from April into the middle of August.  But consistently slower (and often very weak) the remainder of the year.


In short, our region needs to maximize our hydro resources and invest in next-generation nuclear (fission) plants, which are inherently safe.

With rapidly increasing demand for electricity, expected to roughly double by mid-century (see NW Power Council estimate below),  without new generation capacity, there is a near certainty of blackouts, particularly during cold periods. 





21 comments:

  1. Thank you for sharing this important information about what our region's situation is when it comes to the the production of electricity via wind. It seems much of our region isn't up to the task at all, and the parts that are can only do it for part of the year.

    I've heard it suggested that we could start seeing blackouts during peak energy demand periods in the summer in the not so distant future, but I believe you are the first I've heard raise the possibility for such conditions to occur during the winter. It is quite the chilling prospect to think about, but one that our region must start taking seriously.

    Hydro is our friend, and we must accept and embrace that reality. The idea of tearing down the dams on the Snake River never made much sense to me, and with this information, it makes absolutely no sense now. I like salmon as much as anyone, but it cannot come at the expense of denying our region the electricty it needs to sustain itself.

    Nuclear can be a friend as well, so long as it is managed in the safest manner possible. The last thing we need is another Hanford on our hands.

    Wind is nice to have as a supplemental option, but we can't rely on it exclusively.

    ReplyDelete
  2. How about nuclear power plants not based on 1950s technology? Small modular reactors (SMRs) are gaining traction. 3-mile island may come back online. Safety concerns are a tiny fraction of a percent that they once were.

    ReplyDelete
  3. One thing you left out - the windmills are an ugly blight on the land. Driving by, the expression is always the same.. "what happened to this once beautiful place?" We deface the earth in exchange for a pittance of energy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think windmills are neat looking. I think gas stations are ugly, garish blights in the land that sell junk food, addictive substances. And people driving by in their big ugly cars.

      Delete
    2. Windmills are lovely. It's all the cars driving by that ruin the scenery. Of course beauty is subjective, isn't it?

      Delete
    3. You see a "neat looking windmill" but are you able to see the larger picture? Study John Muir.

      Delete
  4. Forget hydro power. Stream and rivers need to be left free flowing. Waste of tax payer dollars. Too expensive without tax payer subsidies.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's actually pretty cheap once built out. And carbon-free. But I agree, we need free-flowing rivers too.

      Delete
  5. Not good news for those who don’t heat with wood.

    ReplyDelete
  6. In addition to existing energy facilities, there is geothermal.
    Central Washington University, Ellensburg, is underway with new construction of a "North Academic Complex" to be heated and cooled (along with a couple of existing buildings to be retrofitted) with a geothermal facility called a GeoEco Plant. The project is a set of large ground source heat pumps (GSHP). The 800 ft deep water is warm – like kitchen sink warm tap water. The existing heating plant does not do cooling – a long running complaint from CWU folks.
    The Yakima Herald-Republic has a story: " New building at CWU campus in Ellensburg to use geothermal energy " from Oct 30. There is a time-lapse video link near the end. It shows the main drilling site and the Eco building with a view to the SE.
    Gonzaga has projects also.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Drilling almost 1k not sustainable cost wise for the average Jo

      Delete
  7. Dams are river killers. Small Nuclear plants are a better option. Make the power companies pay for em, not taxpayers.

    ReplyDelete
  8. How about we ban Bitcoin? It is a power drain and does not produce anything useful.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Exactly. I'm not sure artificial intelligence is s good investment either.

      Delete
  9. Worse, the wind power arrives right when hydropower is flush from spring runoff from melting snow, so there's a surplus of power. So instead of generating power the dams spill the water which puts nitrogen in the water which kills the fish.

    So the more wind power you build in the Pacific North West, the more fish you kill.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Nice post, Cliff.

    Note in your chart showing the BPA Statistics for the last week that the hydro generation exceeds the load in the morning and evening. That is because there is a large export to California before the sun come up in the morning and after the sun goes down in the evening. California can carry themselves with solar during the daytime hours, but not when the sun doesn't shine without firing their remaining gas turbines.

    Also, every evaluation of the electric reliability in the Northwest should address the pending ban of the coal-fire generation in Washington. The reliable and steady supply of power from the Centralia Coal Plant and Colstrip is essential for keeping the Northwest electric grid stable. To simply close Centralia and ban the Colstrip power without replacing the generation jeopardizes the electric reliability in the Northwest. Today, the facilities are among the cleanest coal-fired power plants in North America, yet both are planned to be closed due to politics at the end of this year (!) without replacement generation being added to the system.

    The generation and the load must always balance. You cannot remove generation without replacing it. Unless the coal ban is stopped by federal action, in the short- to mid-term, the existing gas peakers will be run more to offset the loss of the coal-fired generation at Centralia and Colstrip. But if the existing peakers are being used more for base-load, what resources will cover the peak? The State talks about importing 'clean' power, but does not identify from whom, from what resources, or at what cost. As the statistics show above, California is also importing power. But what happens when the Northwest cannot supply its our own load, let alone California's too?

    As you point out, solar and wind are not great resources in the Northwest. The rivers are tapped out. And nuclear is far distant yet. And adding transmission has its own set of problems and expenses. Thus my premise again, without the coal, the reliability in the Northwest will be reduced and the rates increased.

    Unfortunately, we seem to lack the State political expertise and the governmental authority to make real progress. We do not have a state-wide coordinated grid. If the projected data center loads come on line, the situation will get much worse before it gets better.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The vertical landfills (wind towers) are derivatives of hydrocarbons... they must be backed up by instantaneous power (nuclear, hydro, nat gas) and the maintenance cycle draws their costs higher than the total capex for mining, refining, construction, transportation, installation, decom. They also crater local property values, reduce the ability for aerial fire fighting, break migration patterns for land animals and birds, destroy the view-shed for property owners and have no track for recycling (they get cut to pieces and placed into horizontal landfills in counties that get tax breaks). Hydropower is consistently reliable, paid for and costs local utilities 4 cents/kWh. Nuclear is proven to be safe and economically viable. The wind and solar sham only exists in light of govt. funded incentives (the BBB [Build Back better] nonsense was rebranded as the IRA [Inflation Reduction Act] with $500B in govt. grift to the green lobby).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nuclear is not economical: https://thehonestsorcerer.medium.com/small-modular-hallucinations-3564dfbc6dff

      Delete
    2. Many disagree with this analysis, including the US Department of Energy:
      https://www.energy.gov/ne/benefits-small-modular-reactors-smrs

      Delete

Please make sure your comments are civil. Name calling and personal attacks are not appropriate.

The Incoming System

 I wanted to provide a brief update on the incoming system. A strong front is approaching, which will bring modest winds and substantial mou...