May 18, 2026

Why the Washington Drought Emergency Should Be Dropped Immediately

It is time to clear the air.   

To definitively correct misinformation being pushed by a Washington State agency, the Seattle Times Climate Times Climate Lab, and some amateur YouTube channels.

The claim that this summer represents a DROUGHT EMERGENCY for Washington State.   

It is simply and demonstrably false.

In a previous blog, I showed that our reservoirs are fuller than normal, soil moisture levels are good, our annual precipitation is at or above normal, and that current crops are doing well. 

But like some vampire, the drought claims can not be killed so easily.   

In particular, the media, YouTube amateurs,  the State Department of Ecology, and others are pinning their drought claims on the Yakima River drainage and this year's low snowpack.

Below, I will demonstrate why they are very much wrong. 

Yakima and Kittitas counties, through which the Yakima River flows, are relatively arid locations, being located in the rain shadow of the Cascade Mountains (see below).


Only with substantial irrigation can they provide the agricultural bounty for which they are well known.

This irrigation comes from two sources.  

Much of Yakima and Kittitas agriculture gets its water from the Yakima River, with some contributions from the Columbia on the eastern side of the area (see map below).   Everyone agrees that the Columbia will have plenty of water this year, so there is no suggestion of drought for the majority of the irrigated land in eastern Washington (blue, purple, and yellow colors below)


The Yakima River drains off the Cascades, starting near Snoqualmie Pass, and is also fed by a few tributaries, such as the Cle Elum, Teenaway, and Naches rivers.

These rivers are mainly fed by mountain rain and melting snow.  Since most of the precipitation falls in winter and spring, while most of the irrigation demand is during the dry summer (particularly July and August), water storage is required.

One source of storage is the Cascade snowpack, which does most of its melting in May and June.  Thus, snowmelt is only a short-period source of water... a fact that will be important later.

And then there are the Yakima River Basin reservoirs (see below), which are filled by both rainfall and snowmelt.

And finally, there is spring and summer rainfall, which is modest in this region.

To fully supply water for all agricultural and human needs of the Yakima irrigation district requires about 2.3 million acre feet for April through September.    The reservoirs can hold about 1.1 million acre-feet, or roughly half what is needed.

The remainder must come from the river flow, supplied by either mountain rain or snowmelt.   

A big issue is timing:  only the reservoirs can supply a large amount of water during mid-summer (July and August) when demand is greatest.  

Keep this fact in your mind...it is crucial.

Now, let's consider the water situation this year.   The annual precipitation was actually wetter than normal over and near the Cascades (see difference in normal during the water years from October 1 to  May 6, below).  So plenty of water falling from the sky.


But much of this precipitation was associated with warm atmospheric rivers and substantial amounts fell as rain, particularly at lower to middle elevations.   Particularly strong atmospheric river events occurred in December (which produced substantial flooding) and March.

Because of the warmth of those atmospheric rivers, the snowpack was below normal this season over the central and southern Cascades, with the Yakima Basin topping out at around 50% of normal (see below).  Not zero, not 20%.   This is going to be important as well.

The substantial precipitation and the wise actions of those running the Yakima reservoirs have led to the Yakima reservoirs filling well in advance of normal.   Filling early without the need for snowmelt.    

Check out the figure below, which shows the water storage this year (blue line) compared to normal (red line).  Stunning.  We are already above the normal mid-June peak!


The Yakima Reservoir storage will remain topped off for several more weeks.  Why?   There is still considerable snow left to melt at higher elevations in the Cascades during the next week or so (see below).


.And the current model forecasts indicate substantial precipitation over the region next week (see totals through next Saturday).


There will be plenty of precipitation and snowmelt to keep the Yakima Reservoir system topped off through the end of the month.  No drying heatwaves are forecast during this period.

With Yakima Reservoir full in early June, there is a near certainty of sufficient water for Yakima County agriculture this summer.

I am not speculating....I checked.   Full reservoirs starting the summer are associated with ample water for agriculture in Yakima and Kittitas Counties.  There have been no examples of serious agricultural water issues for years in which these reservoirs start off the summer full. 

So how could the Department of Ecology and others get this so wrong?

They did not consider several unusual aspects of the past year.   

We started off with very low river and reservoir levels last fall.  But then we had crazy heavy warm rain in December, which caused a massive increase in river levels on both sides of the Cascades.   To illustrate, the figure below shows the flow on the Yakima River at Umtanum over the past two years (see below, black line).  Then, in March, another major event occurred.  Both were at record levels (dark blue lines)



Knowing about the low snowpack, the Yakima system water managers saved a portion of the huge influx of water,  pushing storage WAY above normal.  Very wise.

Normally, some of the melting snowpack is used to fill the reservoirs, but because of the heavy rain, it was not needed.   Thus, the melting snow could be used simply to keep the reservoir topped off and support reasonable flows.   

Because of the above-average precipitation last winter and the full reservoirs, we did not need to have a normal snowpack this spring..... 50% could do.   And the substantial rain also provided soil moisture west of the Cascades.

Those falsely calling for a drought emergency love to note that reservoirs can only hold about half the needed water for Yakima irrigation, and thus, they suggest that we need 100% snowpack to get through the summer. 

False!

But they are thinking too simplistically.  During the spring and early there is still substantial precipitation and water draining into the system, providing water for irrigation and other uses.  And we never use 100% of the snowpack water, with substantial amounts running into the sea.   Don't believe me?  Here is the average flow at the Dalles on the Columbia River.

A snowpack with 50% of normal snow still has a LOT of water.

In summary, the Drought Emergency Declaration by Washington State should be dropped immediately.  

Washington State residents deserve accurate information.  Washington agriculture should not be undermined by ill-advised, unscientific declarations.



37 comments:

  1. They lower the reservoirs to accommodate snow melt. The reservoirs are only full this time of year if snow pack is bad and they don't expect much runoff. It's not really a sign that everything is fine. It's typically the opposite.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Booger...what you are saying is not correct. They did not lower the reservoirs this year to accommodate snow melt. They kept all the water when it was available...a smart move...cliff

      Delete
    2. Reservoirs never below full in recent weeks- recently about. 96% full

      Delete
  2. Thanks for this fine analysis - once again!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The department of ecology is filled with bureaucrats that must toe the line of the climate change wing of past administrations. A normal yearly precipitation and facts regarding reservoir storage levels won't move their collective narrative that we are in drought, if they can somehow tie other facts with their pre-conceived notions.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Even if there were a drought its idiotic to declare that it is state wide, down here in Steamboat island area NW of Olympia we received plenty of rain this year, there is a large blueberry bog near me that I drive by all the time, this bog fills with water every winter and there is a metal structure 3 or 4 feet high you can use to judge how high the water gets and this year it was completely submerged ! I haven't seen it that high in years plus it was fuller for a way longer length of time then usual. bodes well for people Lile me that have well water

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Washington state insanity knows no bounds. Facts are discarded when they don't fit the narrative. Thanks for shining factual light on the drought and climate change nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
  6. It is possible that the Yakima Valley with its larger reservoirs that are full at this time may get by this summer without much problem with lack of water. The Wenatchee valley, on the other hand, may be more threatened since it has much smaller reservoirs feeding the Wenatchee river system and the snow pack is also very scant this year. Much will depend on the nature of the weather from now through summer, as another hot, dry summer could bring problems.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are no reservoirs at all feeding the Wenatchee River. Lake Wenatchee is the river's source, and it is not dammed or a reservoir, it is a natural lake that is fed by snow and glacier melt. The Wenatchee Valley has the Columbia River running through the middle of it, it has no need for reservoirs on the Wenatchee River.

      Delete
    2. Last I looked, the Columbia runs through Wenatchee, not the Wenatchee Valley.

      Delete
    3. The Icicle irrigation ditch is fed by the Icicle river and it has some small mountain lakes, for example the Snow Lakes, that were dammed to provide some control of the runoff for irrigation. The Icicle ditch waters a number of the orchards in the Wenatchee valley. Much of the rest of the Wenatchee valley orchards and those in East Wenatchee are watered by a larger ditch which takes the water out of the Wenatchee river near Peshastin. Orchards along the Columbia river north of where the Wenatchee river comes in use water from the Columbia. There have been a number of dry years in the past where lack of water due to low snow years have caused problems with the growers in the Wenatchee valley.

      the

      Delete
    4. Wxman, you are correct, I wasn't thinking of the Icicle. And those reservoirs are tiny, but yes, still reservoirs. And oldwxman, you can look all you want. I lived in East Wenatchee for years. Wenatchee is in a valley, and the Columbia River runs through it. I'm not sure what point you are trying to make.

      Delete
    5. The point I was making is that the Columbia does not supply water to the Wenatchee Valley, except as has been pointed out. BTW, I lived and provided weather forecasts for the Wenatchee and Yakima areas for over 50 years.

      Delete
  7. From a strict ecological perspective, we should have put our mega-cities out in Eastern Washington and done our farming here. We've done it backwards!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a reason for this. Eastside soils, warmer and more sunny, better for farming with controlled irrigation. Westside crops could dround out, fields too wet for machinery, cool wet days stunt crop grow, humidity allows more crop disease ect.

      Delete
    2. Well they didn't have Google AI to tell them what to do, so big mistakes were made back then.

      Delete
  8. Take a drive over Snoqualmie Pass and look at Lake Kachess. I just drove by there this weekend and it is as full as I have seen in years.

    ReplyDelete
  9. That’s right! Let it burn, and let it go dry. No finer way to learn.

    ReplyDelete
  10. This will tell the story. The Roza Irrigation District in the Yakima Valley has junior water rights. Let's see how much water they are allotted this year.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Cliff, your data on reservoirs, soil moisture, and crop conditions is solid, and the credit you give reservoir managers is well earned. But four points push back on the "no emergency" framing.

    **On the definition.** In Washington, "drought emergency" isn't the dictionary word. It's the statutory trigger under RCW 43.83B — water supply forecast below 75% of normal with likely hardship. The declaration unlocks specific tools: expedited emergency water-right permits, temporary water-right transfers, and modest cost-share grants. It is an administrative key, not a public alarm.

    **On the snowpack.** At about 52% of median, statewide snowpack sits near the 5th percentile of record — only 2005 and 2015 were lower since 1985, and both produced real summer impacts. "50% isn't zero" is true, but a 5th-percentile year is the bottom of the historical distribution, not a routine below-average one.

    **On the timing.** Mitigation work — leasing water, drilling emergency wells, repairing canals, lining up alternative supplies for small water systems — takes months to permit and execute. Wait until August when impacts are obvious and you cannot deploy any of it. That is precisely why the 2023 legislative change (SHB 1138) authorized forward-looking declarations: so action can start before harm lands.

    **On where the money goes.** From 2015 through early 2024, the drought response grant program awarded roughly $2.3M across 22 projects — about 13 for small city and domestic drinking water systems, 6 for irrigation (mostly tree fruit), and 3 for fisheries, concentrated in Clallam and Yakima counties. Recent 2024 spending included a 25% state match on Yakima Basin water-bank mitigation so irrigators could access drought wells; 2026 grants are headed toward projects like the fire- and flood-damaged Yakima-Tieton canal. These are reimbursement cost-share grants capped at 25% of the pot per project — small-dollar emergency aid for the kind of farmers and rural water systems you'd otherwise sympathize with, not a discretionary slush fund.

    The declarations may be over-marketed in press releases, but the mechanism itself is doing measurable work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The definition of drought is not the good old factual one- that was of 85% or lower- they tweaked it to allow anytime they think of might be a drought

      Delete
    2. Thank you for these points, and I agree. The bigger problem with the "emergency" declaration is the way people, including media and bloggers, overreact to the word. As citizens, we're not in an emergency situation due to the drought, but as an administrative tool it is very useful.

      Delete
    3. Thanks, just what I was thinking but you said it more articulately. My coworkers have done drought response work on the Dungeness and the funding and resources are important for taking measures to help salmon navigate low water in the river.

      Delete
  12. For what it's worth, there IS also summer rainfall in many areas. Given that the meaning of "drought" (in real terms) relates to long-term dryness so severe that plants and animals suffer, there's scant evidence of genuine "statewide" drought. The work-arounds related to "75% of water supply" language in code - and that being tied to snowpack - is where the issue has gone off the rails, for years.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Cliff, I wish that you could mention the Olympic Peninsula water circumstances more often, thanks!

    ReplyDelete
  14. The ecology and also drought.gov stuff is deeply political- they have to amplify hysteria about weather events, to the point of lying

    ReplyDelete
  15. Youre very correct about the Columbia River. The headwaters in British Columbia in both the Canadian Rockies and Selkirk ranges have above average snowpack. ​BC Hydro forecasts spring and summer runoff in the Canadian portion of the basin at 104% to 112% of normal, driven by the strong mountain snowpack. Refilling is already actively underway, with water levels at major reservoirs like Arrow Lakes and Lake Revelstoke climbing steadily toward their summer targets. Expected "full pool" cconditions. Might be a good year to check out the spillway at Grand Coulee.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for sharing whats happening in BCA. Very important context for fully understanding the situation on the mighty Columbia!

      Delete
  16. Cliff, I think one of the reasons that you receive so much pushback from the Climate Change Industrial Complex is that the logical conclusion one draws from reading this is that we have to build more reservoir capacity to deal with anomalously warm winters. That they cannot abide. Their guiding star is to tear down dams, whether on the Elwha or the Snake. They would tear the entire economy of the PNW down to improve matters for fish species which are fundamentally incompatible with large human populations.

    That the dams boost water resources during low-snowpack years? Lalala they can't hear you.
    That they provide free hydropower, zero carbon, straight from solar flux? Lalala they can't hear you.
    That they average out the feast or famine of seasonal stream flows, saving us from catastrophic floods and allowing river navigation for exports? Lalala they can't hear you.

    Their only, and I mean ONLY play is to cross their fingers and become carbon scolds, thinking they can arrest global warming. That is not going to happen with China, India, and Africa ascendant in the global economy. It's fundamentally disordered thinking, and that's what makes it so irritating.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Cliff, since your post focuses on the Yakima basin, I would love to hear your thoughts about today’s story in ST headlined “ Yakima River farmers accept early water cuts as drought deepens.”

    From the story:
    ‘“Roughly four-fifths of the basin’s waterways aren’t connected to a reservoir, so the vast majority of that rainfall couldn’t be captured, Revell said. Without snowpack acting as a natural reservoir, slowly releasing meltwater into June, that water is essentially lost.

    “Snowpack’s the killer,” he said.’

    This seems to be at odds with your statement: “there near certainty of sufficient water for Yakima County agriculture this summer. Scott Revell is manager of the Roza Irrigation District in the Yakima River basin. Is there anything he got wrong?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jerry..the seattle times article is full of errors. Check my comments on the story on the ST website...cliff

      Delete
  18. The states has collected about $2 billion in climate taxes- time for them to fund some dam improvements- rather than buying rain gear for the tribes

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The state is buying rain gear for the tribes? Where was this reported? I would like to know more about this.

      Delete
  19. What about the Lake Cushman Reservoir? On May 22nd 2026 Tacoma Power sent a letter to Lake Cushman residents that projected inflows are projected to be the lowest since 1929. Consequences include recreation & boating leaving docks high and dry and makes boat launches unusable, limiting summer tourism and water sports. Shrinking shorelines expose underwater tree stumps and sunken debris. This makes swimming and boating much more dangerous. To protect endangered fish downstream, Tacoma Power must release water to maintain minimum river flows for the North Fork Skokomish River. Powerhouse #2 has been kept offline since April and will only be brought back online if there is a regional power emergency. How unusual is the 2026 projected low water level and extended shutdown of Powerhouse #2?.

    ReplyDelete

Please make sure your comments are civil. Name calling and personal attacks are not appropriate.

Meteorological Roller Coaster

June is an interesting weather month in the Northwest. The sun is very strong, so with the right conditions, temperatures can zoom up to ext...