Just over a year ago, western Maui was hit by a powerful downslope windstorm that initiated a wildfire that destroyed the historic town of Lahaina.
A terrible tragedy that cost the lives of approximately 100 people and resulted in roughly 4 billion dollars of damage.
Hawaiian Electric, local government, and others have taken some steps to prevent the tragedy from reoccurring. Unfortunately, for the reasons outlined below, I worry there are gaps in their efforts that could lead to a repeat of the terrible disaster of August 2023.
Examining the Meteorology of the Lahaina Event
I do a lot of research on the meteorology of western U.S. wildfires, and particularly wildfires associated with downslope windstorm events, which characterize the 2023 Maui wildfire. I received a grant from the National Science Foundation to study the meteorology and predictability of the Lahaina event, and after some intensive work with research meteorologist David Ovens, published a paper on the subject.
There were several significamt findings of the paper:
1. The wildfire was associated with a strong downslope windstorm, which damaged powerlines starting the fire.
2. The event was highly predictable up to approximately a week ahead using high-resolution model forecasts.
3. The observational network on Maui and the rest of the islands was very poor.
4. There were multiple levels of failure by Hawaiian Electric and public authorities. Furthermore, the National Weather Service never highlighted the particular threat to Lahaina even though its high-resolution model (HRRR) clearly predicted the strong winds (see below)
Hawaiian Electric's Attempt to Deal with the Threat
During the last months, Hawaiian Electric announced its response to the wildfire threat.
First, they are adding several dozen new weather stations around the island, particularly in observation gap areas. For example, there are now observations near Lahaina, where none had existed before (see current map below). This is good. But there are still major gaps in the observational network. Furthermore, surface observations tell you what is happening NOW, not what will happen in the future. And to save lives and property, forecasts are critical.
Finally, there is a lack of upper-air observations, which are critical for forecasting (more on this later).
Second, Hawaiian Electric plans to harden and modernize its distribution network, much of which is outdated and below modern standards for robustness to strong winds. Commendable and high priority, but will take years to complete.
Third, Hawaiian Electric plans to start doing Public Safety Power Shutoffs (PSPSs) when threatening conditions are expected, not unlike what has been done by California utilities. Its a way of dealing with deficient power distribution network surrounded lots of flammable fuels.
Unfortunately, there are weaknesses in their plans for PSPSs.
According to Hawaiian Electric documents, their decision to initiate a PSPS will first depend on observations (identifying persistent drought conditions, wind gusts of 45 mph and more, relative humidity below 45%). That is a good start, but reacting to observations is not good enough. Winds can increase suddenly. People, businesses, and others need more time to prepare.
Hawaiian Electric states they will use National Weather Service (NWS) public forecasts, but that is not good enough, something highlighted by the relatively poor performance of NWS predictions during the Lahaina wildfire. During that event, the NWS failed to highlight the great threat to Lahaina. Instead, the NWS put out a broad-brush red flag warning for the lee side of all the Hawaiian Islands. Not good enough.
Hawaiian Electric needs to use high-resolution numerical model forecasts for their decision making including PSPS declarations.
There are a variety of ways Hawaiian Electric can secure such model predictions:
1. Run the models themselves, which is what California utilities (e.g. PGE) are doing.
2. Use the NOAA/NWS HRRR-Hawaii model, which is run regularly in "experimental" mode. This is totally silly by the way....NOAA/NWS needs a hardened, high-resolution operational model for Hawaii.
3. Hawaiian Electric should use the high-resolution regional weather prediction made by the University of Hawaii Manoa.
Hawaiian Electric also needs to have a team of meteorologists constantly monitoring both the observations and high-resolution model forecasts. I don't thing they have any at this point.
They also should talk to the USDA Forest Service to give Hawaii critical wildfire weather diagnostics enjoyed by the rest of the U.S., such as the valuable HOT-DRY-WIND diagnostic.
Better Observations Aloft of Hawaii
The state and local governments need to address the fuel source, namely the invasive grasses. They need to require the land owners to mow the grass and remove the cut grasses. A tractor can use a flail (chains) mower to cut the grass and then followed by a collector. No fuel, no fire.
ReplyDeleteWhile I agree with the premise. Having people forced to mow with a flail mower might just be as dangerous as they inevitably will do it during a wrong time and spark a fire. If the local government and conservation districts were on it, they would of quickly gave land owners native grass seed and weed sprays to replant and knock down invasive species. After the Okanogan Complex we could go to our weed board get sprays and conservation districts to get seed. Hard to repopulate natural plants when invasive has taken over and fires taking out invasive gives perfect opportunity to do so. The other thing is the government could mow down areas boarding state and private, they would have resources to mitigate risk of fire starts. This would at least establish a fire break point for them to try to engage fire.
DeleteAngry Chuck here, Was just in Lahaina/N.Maui. Dry brush and grass. Lots of it. Was pretty wet with the tropical storms a week ago. More goats needed. 40$ hamburgers, fruit shortage at the resorts. Hard to be angry there, I must admit.
ReplyDeleteIt's the Hawaiian culture Cliff. Forget it.. ain't going to happen.
ReplyDeleteHow possible would it be to DIY a vertical profiler? perhaps a crowdsource can help. or perhaps Larry or Mark can fund this as a donation?
ReplyDelete