We are now in the time of year with the lowest electricity demand in the Pacific Northwest, driven by our meteorology (see below).
The major peak occurs in winter, when electricity is needed to heat homes and buildings. There is a minor peak in mid-summer, driven by air conditioner use.
With mild temperatures over the region, the demand for electricity is at a minimum during early to mid-September.
Everyone wants to maximize the use of renewable energy, such as wind and solar, so how well do they match the demand noted above?
To help answer this question, below is a plot of wind power generation for the Northwest (solar is at the noise level).
A maximum in spring and a minimum in August. This makes sense meteorologically since most of our wind turbines are east of the Cascades, mainly on the lower slopes (e.g., Ellensburg area) or downwind of the Columbia Gorge.
Why this annual variation?
The difference in pressure across the Cascades, which drives the westerly winds, is largest in spring because the temperature difference across the Cascades is largest then, with eastern WA/Oregin heating up more rapidly than coastal areas. Differences in temperature drive differences in pressure, which drive the winds that produce power.




I'm glad to hear another voice in support of nuclear power (and energy)! There is no possible way to support our future energy demand on wind and solar. And hydropower while historically plentiful, may not have the capacity to support future demand.
ReplyDeleteAmen. Yep. Nuclear can work and we need to step up and store the waste in the billion dollar storage sites that have already been build.
ReplyDeleteWe live within a reasonable high voltage transmission distance from the best solar resources in the nation in the Southwest and the best onshore wind resources in the Northern Great Plains. There is already the Pacific DC intertie connecting us to Los Angles, built to bring energy from our dams south. What we are is an excellent location for hydroelectric energy storage, both in existing dams and potential new pump-hydro infrastructure.
ReplyDeleteThis is a problem that should be looked at from a system perspective, not on a state by state level. That's not to say nuclear doesn't have a place, but there is no reason that the state of Washington needs to be energy independent, we are part of a larger region/nation that does have tremendous renewable resources.
I am against more data centers. We don't need then, and we have done just fine so far with what we have. Same for bitcoin; it's a waste and unnecessary..
ReplyDeleteBut I am not surprised that August is the least windy month. Unscientifically, it does seem to me as a sailor that August has less wind that neighboring months (I don't sail in winter, but I gather it is a fairly windy, but only in the Western part of the state).
Just about the most expensive option there is. Even offshore wind (which is much more reliable) is cheaper; ditto for renewables with battery storage.
ReplyDeleteOr, we build a futureproof grid that transmits power from parts of the country where short days and overcast are not the limiting factors they are here, especially when solar is now averaging 12 cents per watt globally. China has already built low-loss HVDC grids that span thousands of miles. The question is: why do we insist on keeping 19th and 20th century energy technology/policy on subsidized life support while ceding the energy tech future to China?
ReplyDeleteAfter all, the WPPSS plant worked out so well. Let's build a few more boondoggles!
ReplyDelete