They called their collection of log buildings, Fort Clatsop, and remained there until late March 1806 (see artist rendering).
Unfortunately, they learned rapidly that they had picked one of wettest, dampest lowland places in North America, with plenty of wind to make things even more unpleasant They were miserable, as their comments on December 16, 1805 made clear:
"The rain continues, with Tremendious gusts of
wind. The winds violent. Trees falling in every
direction, whorl winds, with gusts of rain. Hail & Thunder, This
kind of weather lasted all day, Certainly one of the worst days that
ever was!"
Frequent comments included: "we are all wet and disagreeable," "cold and a dreadful day,"
and, "the rain continued as usual"
If only they had a meteorologist with them! Consider the Oregon annual rainfall map (see image). They had camped in a location that receives about 100 inches a year, most of it falling during the midwinter period in which they camped. Not a good choice. If only they had made camp near Portland, they could have found a location with roughly a third as much rain, and considerably less wind.
Of the 106 days the Corps of Discovery spent on the coast only twelve were free of rain and only six were sunny. I suspect they knew they had picked a very wet location, but wanted to be near the ocean where they would have a chance to interact with a passing ship. Perhaps they hoped for a ride to Hawaii.
And one more thing: only a few miles from Fort Clatsop there is Cape Disappointment, the foggiest location in the lower 48 states, with 106 days of heavy fog a year. So they were wet, fogged in, and we haven't have talked about the strong winter winds of the area. Not your winter vacation spot.
Typical (foggy) conditions at Cape Disappointment |
I bet Sacajawea gave them the dickens. "weather come from west...mountians block weathers...you do math white man".
ReplyDelete"If you need me I'll be in Portland have a nice IPA."
Opps, please give credit to our neighbors to the north for making the first transcontinental trek. Alexander Mackenzie reached Bella Coola, British Columbia on July 20, 1793. And he was followed by Simon Fraiser before 1805.
ReplyDeleteHowever, they needed close proximity to salt water. They needed that salt to cure meat for the trip back. So, they may have been stuck being west of the Coast Range.
ReplyDeleteNice post, Cliff!
ReplyDeleteAny word on the NWS special weather statement today concerning model indications of a powerful storm, coming our way in W. Washington?
Hi,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the information about this Really nice Post.
coola iphone 4 skal