Seattle has had the wettest March in its historical record.
As of 5 PM last night, there was 9.44 inches in the gauge at Seattle-Tacoma Airport, more than TWICE the normal March monthly total of 3.72 inches. This is the all time monthly record for March at this location, for a record going back into the late 19th century (at the airport until 1948 and downtown Seattle before that)
At the National Weather Service office in north Seattle (Sand Point) they also had their monthly record for March (9.22 inches), for a shorter observing period (going back to 1986).
My lawn has turned into a carpet of moss and my deck is now green.
The plot of precipitation versus normal (yellow line) for 2014 shows the story (upper plot below). Seattle was quite dry from mid-January to mid-February, but then the pluvial gods took over for the next month.
Many of the stations around Puget Sound are having a top-ten precipitation total for March, but the amounts appears less unusual than Seattle at places like Olympia and Bellingham.
Many of the heavier precipitation events over the region were associated with atmospheric rivers, plumes of moisture appearing to project northeastward out of the subtropics. The image below shows vertical moisture totals and was provided by Sheldon Kusselson of NOAA/NESDIS. You see the fingers of high moisture values (generally green) heading right towards us? When that moisture interacts with our mountains, heavy precipitation results.
Naturally, there is substantial interest in the precipitation that fell on the mountains around the landslide area near Oso, Washington. As I mentioned in a previous blog, perhaps the most relevant location is the Finney Creek RAWS site (see map, oval shows the landslide, symbols the observing location) in the terran about 7 miles to the NNE of the landsldie
Here is the precipitation at Finney Creek since the beginning of the year. After a dry stretch it started to rain again around Feb 12th, with a big ramp up the first two weeks of March.
Here is the hourly rainfall and cumulative total in March. About 22 inches this month, and some periods of intense rainfall (hourly totals exceeding .3 inches an hour).
There is not a long record at this site, but 2007 was almost as wet (20.04 inches),
Deep-seated landslides, such as the Oso slide on March 22rd, respond more to longer-period rainfall rather than heavy rainfall over hours or a day that result in many shallow slope failures. Why the slope near Oso failed during this particular period is something that will undoubtedly be studied by geomorphologists more knowledgeable than I am in such matters, such as UW's Professor David Montgomery.
I'm hoping that you will take a detailed, in-depth look at the drought in California at some point. I've spent a bunch of time at their water site, and it seems to me that this year's drought will be bad, but not nearly as bad as 1976-1977 or 1923-1924, because of the heavy precipitation they got in February and March.
ReplyDeleteBut it would be interesting to get your take on it at some point. I understand that the state does a big survey of the water content of their mountain snow in the beginning of April, and then issues some sort of forecast.
Personally, I think Obama and his climate guy, James P. Holdren (who was pushing the "new Ice Age" thing back in the early 1970s) made fools of themselves by tying the California drought to climate change. That aside, it'd be good to get your expert analysis of California's drought conditions.
Thanks for all the great stuff here.
Curious why you chose the calendar year instead of the water year? The water year data are still showing a slight deficit.
ReplyDelete