Aesop's Fable "The Boy Who Cried Wolf" talks about the danger of exaggerating a threat to the point that no one believes you.
The Department of Ecology and the Seattle Times would be well advised to read this ancient story, because they are misleading the people of our state with their claims of a "drought emergency."
The truth is clear: such "emergency" claims are contradicted by the facts.
Crying wolf about a non-existent drought not only lessens public confidence in such warnings but wastes money and can lead to a lack of public response when the situation becomes truly serious.
Remember the definition of an emergency (Cambridge Dictionary):
A dangerous or serious situation, such as an accident, that happens suddenly or unexpectedly and needs immediate action
As described in this and my previous blog, the current precipitation situation is not dangerous, did not develop suddenly, and does not require immediate action.
The snowpack is not in an "emergency" state, with relevant basin being 86% of normal (see below from USDA)
The situation this year will be far better (moister) than last year. But even with drier conditions than this year, agricultural productivity in Washington State was quite good in 2024 (see below), with the greatest weather problem for 2024 being the cold wave last spring (not drought).
Good news on the temperature front this year: no freezing cold wave predicted by the very skillful ECMWF ensemble of many forecasts through the end of the month. Once in May the threat is over.
I talked to a reporter from WA Ag Information Network today and he had talked to several growers. They are optimistic about the current season.
Excellent article and explanations of the data.
ReplyDeleteI agree, save "emergency" for the real deal. Actual drought in western WA seems exceedingly rare.
ReplyDeleteEcology declaring the "emergency drought" transfers $4.5 million from the state general fund to entities who apply for funds; enacted in HB 1138 - 2023-24. Hazard a guess these funds end up being a slush fund for legislators pet water projects.
ReplyDeleteYou've misinterpreted the fable. There was a wolf but the towns people got lazy. The wolf would run away when the towns people approached. The wolf was persistent.
ReplyDelete