When many folks think about Northwest wildfires they visualize a burning forest.
But in reality, most Northwest wildfires are grass or range fires, with trees playing a minor role.
As we will see, grass fires have little to do with climate change, but a LOT to do with flammable, human-spread invasive grasses and human ignition. And such grass fires can subsequently contribute to wildfires in adjacent forests.
Consider a visible satellite image from early this afternoon (from a NASA MODIS satellite). You can clearly see the smoke from some fires over eastern Washington and Oregon. This satellite also can sense the heat from the fires (orange dots).
Look closely and you will notice that few fires are over elevated terrain with dense forests. Most are associated with extensive grasses and range vegetation (including small shrubs).
For reference, here are the current fires from the Northwest Fire Coordination Center.
One of the most active Washington fires is the Black Canyon fire northwest of Yakima, which has spread over 4500 acres in grass (see photo below).
The biggest fire in the region is the Lone Rock Fire of northeast Oregon, which has now spread over 131,000 acres. Grass and shrubs. Most of the fires in our region...and most of the smoke production..is from grass and range vegetation.
In fact, the USDA Fuelcast website diagnoses how much grass/range fuel is available (see latest determination below). Bountiful, above-average values are in place over eastern Oregon and Washington (dark green colors) thanks to a moist spring and leftover dead grass from last year.
It is important to note that large dangerous levels of light fuels such as grasses are NOT due to drought, but rather above-normal precipitation during growth periods.
Summer heat and drought have little impact on grass fire potential since our normally dry summers are virtually always able to cure and dry out grasses and the like.
Consider the Columbia NWR RAWS site near Othello (a picture of the nearby terrain is shown).
The ten hour fuel moisture percentage (the moisture level of light vegetation) for this site for the past several months is shown below. Under roughly 12% is dry enough for fire. Clearly, such fuels have been dry enough to burn for months. During every summer such fuels are ready to burn. With or without global warming.
But something HAS changed that makes grass/range fires more likely: the replacement of native (less flammable) bunch grasses with invasive, flammable grasses such as cheatgrass (also known as grassoline).
Here is a map of where cheatgrass has moved in. Large areas of our region.
In addition, these human-spread flammable grasses are more likely to be ignited these days, with large increases in population as well as fire-inducing human activities (from fireworks and off-road vehicles to gunnery practice to deficient power infrastructure, to name only a few.)
Strong winds play a critical role in spreading grass fires, something of particular note on the windy, lower eastern slopes of the Cascades.
Too many media outlets blame grass and range fires on climate change without factual bases or supportive information. Grass/range fires also play a large role in inducing forest fires, something I will discuss in a future blog.
Plus years of fire suppression have allowed forests to start growing on what normally would be grasslands
ReplyDeleteKey Point: Let's return to environmental issues and questions regarding ecology which actually have actionable solutions, such as habitat restoration, rather than following the narratives of neo-Marxists who want you in a continual state of anxiety and to hate humanity. There are steps we can take to have an impact individually, without coercion and freedom-limiting regulations, to allow native ecosystems to flourish.
ReplyDeleteCheatgrass is a tough one. For most exotic invasives, the only long-term way to prevent their proliferation is to restore native biological terrain (such as bio-crusts to form on soils, e.g. cheatgrass), which allows natives to lock in. My argument is that this should be done, always, at a local level (family farms, low tech), and that ultimately, big-industry, big-anything is not a our friend. But that's a whole 'nuther discussion.
Being critical of big-industry sounds kind of neo-Marxist to me, not that I disagree. Out of curiosity, what regulations are you most concerned about limiting your freedoms? Which freedoms? How are neo-Marxists creating an environment of anxiety and misanthropy?
DeleteYeah right ... because individuals always have all the time and money needed to restore ecosystems! Give me a break.
DeleteClimate regulations are the noted undertone of my note. And yes, Pam, the solution is always at the local level, accomplished by individuals, families and communities, who have real interests in places, which they know. Point is that when government regulates, they tend to cohabitate with industry. Regulations lead to socialism and when industry gets their hands into the pie and it becomes fascism. Should I really try to use a term like neo-liberal-Marxist-fascism? A bit ridiculous.
DeleteI think neo-liberal-Marxist-facism really gets at how difficult it is to define these things into neat categories, especially when they overlap in some areas while being mutually exclusive in others. Regulations don't lead to socialism and are in fact critical to a well functioning free market. At one point the government didn't regulate lead contamination, but I think we can all agree that we are glad they do now. Without federal regulations around anti-trust, our marketplace would be much less competitive. I agree that many solutions are best made at the local level, but what are local governments but more lean and agile versions of state and federal ones? There is a place for each, and we should be focused more on improving them to better serve our communities rather than tearing them down.
DeleteNice moderate-thinking, Chrometrails. It is a balance and a pendulum swing.
DeleteInteresting post, Cliff. When you say "most Northwest wildfires", are you referring to number of separate fires, or total acreage?
ReplyDeleteboth
DeleteIt's been a few years now of cool wet springs and warmer summers. Is that combination a climate change related phenomena going forward? I'm going to push back on putting the current Oregon fires on grass fuel though. Even just on the east side of the state, the good majority of acreage burned is not grass but national forest, generally ponderosa. And that's not including the many dozens of fires in the south cascades right now, both lightning and human caused. I would hope for a more nuanced discussion of what is and isn't climate change related in all these fires.
ReplyDeleteKevin K - I agree with you, and the satellite photo and NFCC graphic in Cliff's post back you up.
DeleteI live 20 miles NE of the Black Canyon fire. The smoke has shifted toward me over the past days, but is not here. Today, there is some filtering of sunlight. The area gets between 8 and 9 inches of precipitation. Cheat dried out weeks ago.
ReplyDeleteA few years ago there was a fire (Evans Canyon Fire) on the west side of the valley where the Black Canyon Fire now burns. Evans is two canyons north of Jones Canyon; using Google Earth, look here:
46.850668, -120.760345
There are scattered trees where you should see the name: Jones Canyon. Over years the trees produce a lot of needles, cones, and branches that build a fuel load for a hot fire. The surface fire killed all the grass and shrubs. A bunch of us went in on the road coming from the south in this view, parking at the intersection. We planted Sage plugs and grass seed, working up grade for about a mile.
The Black Canyon area, just 5 miles east, is without trees. Search for "Cleman Mountain" and check elevations and tree cover to see some of the character. This is a great place for hiking, biking, and horse riding.
Whether they are grass fires or forest fires, the recent spate of large fires throughout the Pacific Northwest and British Columbia are mainly the result of the prolonged warm, dry spell on this side of the mountains. Even grass fires are more numerous and hotter burning after and during prolonged periods of warm, dry weather, such as we have had this summer. Yes, grasses dry out fairly quickly but historically our largest grass fires have occurred during and after hot, dry spells. We have windy, cool days in Eastern Washington in summer, or at least in the past we did, and we seldom got large grass fires during these cooler, windy days. Forest fires definitely require a prolonged warm, dry period in order to dry out the larger forest fuels. Granted cheat grass is a factor, although it has been around for some time, and wetter springs encouraging grass growth is also a factor. But are these of greater impact than the warmer, drier summers which have become more frequent lately? We may not be able to prove which factors are most important but I lean toward the increasingly hot, dry summers and if this is the result of climate change, then maybe climate change is causing more grass fires.
ReplyDeleteGood points.
DeletePerhaps the fact that fires are started during our "hottest dry spells" from human activity skews the numbers for you a bit. Whether arson or carelessness the major catastrophic grass fires are human caused, from power lines, to mowing to welding or grinding to bad wheel bearings. The way we feel fires are "worse" than ever could be more fires are started during the worst of times. Have humans just become more careless? Their are times you don't even want to fart it is so hot and dry, yet we have people dragging chains, mowing fence edges ect. Old timers I think knew the dangers and refrained from screwing up. Now we can't even trust a human to put the right bolts on a plane door, let alone humans making smart decisions during the hottest and driest of times.
DeleteFor those interested, I highly recommend reading "Fire in America: A Cultural History of Wildland and Rural Fire" by Stephen J. Pyne which discusses how different areas of the US have burned through history, human influence on what burns and where, and the significance of fires to us and our ecosystems today.
ReplyDeleteModels are showing a fall like system for next Monday. Very unusual during the dryest time of the year than the heat returns in force afterwards.
ReplyDelete